Skip to content

A rubberised mesh is the cheapest fish-welfare decision on this site

A knotted nylon net strips scales and takes the slime coat off a flank. Rubberised, knotless and soft meshes do not, and the difference is about fifteen euros.

What the claim comes down to

Three words appear across the landing net and keepnet shelves, and they describe the same intention. Rubberised — « gummiert » — is a coating over the mesh. Knotless describes a mesh made without hard knots. And fish-friendly — « fischschonend » — is the outcome both are claimed to produce.

What they change is physical: a knotted nylon mesh strips scales and removes the slime coat, which is the fish’s own protection, and it tangles a treble hook while doing it. A rubberised or knotless mesh does neither.

Nobody certifies any of the three words. They are material descriptions.

What it does not promise

It does not promise a coating that lasts. A rubber skin over nylon wears, and no listing states a life.

It does not promise a frame that keeps its shape, which is a separate claim — the corpus names an aluminium frame on one net and says nothing on the cheapest.

It does not promise depth, which decides whether a fish can spread down into cooler water in a keepnet.

And it does not make a dry mat safe to use. The mesh is one part of a sequence that also includes wetting everything the fish touches.

Where it shows up on this site

On the landing net shelf, where the word is in most titles and its absence on the cheapest products is the real difference between the two ends of the price range. On the keepnet shelf, where the same claim matters more because the fish stays longer. And on the unhooking mat shelf, as the next object in the same sequence.

It is read against the handle length on a net, the length and ring diameter on a keepnet, and the frame material on both.

How it is read here

A page prints the word the maker used and says what it describes — a coating, a construction or an outcome. It does not treat the three as interchangeable, and it does not describe any mesh as safe for a fish. What it does say is which mesh a listing claims, and what a knotted one does that the others do not.

The questions that keep coming back

Is rubberised the same as knotless?

Not quite. Rubberised describes a coating over the mesh; knotless describes how the mesh is made. Both avoid the hard knots that damage a flank, and a listing may claim either or both. The pages print the words the maker used.

Does it help me as well as the fish?

Yes, and that is why it spread: a rubberised mesh does not tangle a treble hook, which saves ten minutes per pike and a lure per season.

Is fish-friendly a measurable claim?

No. « fischschonend » is a description, not a test result, and nobody certifies it. What is checkable is the mesh type and the frame material, which the better listings state.

Does it matter on a keepnet as much as on a landing net?

More, because a fish is in a keepnet for hours rather than seconds. The corpus shows rubberised and supersoft keepnets at the top of that shelf and knotted nylon at the bottom.

Last reviewed 22 September 2026